Development Management Myths: “They Need More Training”

trainingMost of my professional life has been devoted to learning and development management and organizational change management.  I’m always struck by the ease with which managers reach for training as some sort of panacea to cure every ail.

It’s a common mistake made every day by managers who seek to develop the skills of their team and mitigate performance issues.  Got a skills gap?  Let’s throw some training at it.  Have a development need?  Let’s do more training.  Got a performance issue?  Let’s schedule a training session.  Someone not on board with the program?  Training . . . training . . . and still more training.

Training is seemingly the default solution to every problem with little thought given to whether it’s the right solution to the problem or the right fit for the current development need.

Now, all this may seem a bit odd coming from someone who leads a safety-leadership training and development company.  But as an Organization Effectiveness practitioner, I’m really not saying anything new.  Nor am I suggesting that training should be excluded as part of a solution.

from compliance to culture safety leadership workshops

But when it is part of the solution, it is always only the beginning of the development process, never the end game.  Stated differently, “training ain’t development,“ and the sooner we come to terms with that the sooner we’ll rid ourselves of the false expectations and attendant frustration that we create for ourselves when we rely too heavily on a training class to build kno10 things you must know about safety coachingwledge and skills or cure performance issues.

Don’t get me wrong; Training has a seat at the table, but it is not the head seat.  That belongs to something called “outcomes.”  When a client approach me requesting training for their group my first response back to them is usually, What are you hoping this training will fix?  What are you trying to accomplish?  What are your goals?  What are your desired outcomes?  What things need to change?  What needs to look different at the end of it?  The focus should always be on future-state outcomes.

Training may very well be the road to those outcomes, or it may be something else entirely.  Or (more typically) it may a combination of things of which training is merely one component.  The point is, to be successful at development we need to think in terms of outcomes rather than how much training someone may need.

We’ll begin to break all this down next time.  But that’s it for this edition of Recordable INSIGHTS. Until next time be sure all your safety initiatives are built in, not bolted on.


[ Viewers in China and other Youtube-blocked countries, please click here for video ]

Just complete the subscription form (below or top right of our home page) and we’ll send each issue to your inbox for free! Instructional videos, audio clips, articles, e-books, and other resources on how to better lead a safety culture delivered directly to your Inbox each issue!
safetyBUILT-IN YouTube ChannelBe sure to see our other Vlog (Video Blog) entries on our safetyBUILT-IN YouTube Channel!

About the Author

Eric Svendsen
Eric Svendsen, Ph.D., is Principal and lead change agent for safetyBUILT-IN, a safety-leadership learning and development organization. He has over 20 years experience in creating and executing outcomes-based leadership development and culture change initiatives aligned to organizational goals, and he personally led the safety-culture initiatives of a number of client organizations that resulted in “best ever safety performance” years for those companies.